Chloe: Critic Girl/Renaissance Woman

May 5, 2005

Irregardless: illogical and twice as negative

Irregardless: Regardless. (Probably a blend of irrespective and regardless)

Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. . . it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. - Dictionary.com

In fact, this word has always driven me crazy. I don’t think anyone should ever use it.

Apparently, a fellow NPR listener agreed when she pointed out that Bill Gates used the word when he was discussing the need for training more American engineers (he did not comment on all of those who are out of jobs after tech downturns). She also pointed out that Microsoft’s own Encarta calls the word an illogical double negative.

The final kicker is that Encarta does agree with me. As such an illogical double negative, Encarta reports, it shouldn’t be used. It should in fact be forgone for the much more appropriate word: REGARDLESS.

1 Comment »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://renaissance.blogsome.com/2005/05/05/irregardless-illogical/trackback/

  1. testcomment30

    Comment by testanchor526 — October 15, 2005 @ 10:31 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here